SC declines to transfer cases outside Gujarat
08 January, 2007
The Supreme Court has declined to transfer three civil suits outside
Gujarat, seeking about Rs 22.6 crores as damages from Gujarat Chief
Minister Narendra Modi and other senior Gujrat officers for the killing
and injury of the victims of the 2002 communal riots in the State.
Petitioners Imran Mohammad Saleem Dawood, a riot survivor, Shameema
Dawood and Shireen Dawood, two widows of the victim had sought transfer
of three civil suits pending in Sabarkhanta district courts of Gujarat,
on the grounds that a free and fair trial was not possible in the
State, as defendent number one was the incumbent Chief Minister of the
State and no witness would be able to depose freely and without fear.
A bench comprising Justices K G Balakrishnan and D K Jain permitted the
petitioner to withdraw their petitions but refused to grant them
liberty to approach the Court again at a later stage.
Senior Counsel Indira Jaisingh, appearing for Imran, contended that the
Chief Minister was personally responsible for the acts of omission and
commission during the riots.
She also pleaded that everyone who had dared to stand up against the
rioters has been victimised and in such an atmosphere of terror, a free
and fair trial was not possible and the apprehensions of her client are
well-founded.
Pleading for transfer of the cases to Maharashtra she also contended
that even the Head of Intelligence during the riots - Sreekumar has
stated before the Nanavati Commission that there were telephonic
instructions from the Ministers not to act against the rioters and Mr
Modi had himself accompanied the charred bodies of kar sevaks from
Godhra. While turning down the plea of the petitioners to transfer the
trial from the District Court to the State High Court, the Court made
it clear that it has equal faith on the district judiciary and in fact
the disposal of the cases in the district courts is more tedious than
in the High Court.
All three petitioners are British nationals and one of the defence
taken by the defendent is that a foreign national cannot file a suit
for damages. The Apex Court said that the trial court was quite
competent to decide the issue.
(UNI)
Copyright © 2007 Indlaw Communications Pvt. Limited. (ICPL). All rights reserved.
ICPL shall not be liable for the
adequacy of the information, any mistakes, in accuracies or improper
display of content and for any actions taken in reliance there on.
Related News
|